Daily Egyptian

Board of Trustees raises tuition two percent, attendees express concern and frustration over reorganization

Back to Article
Back to Article

Board of Trustees raises tuition two percent, attendees express concern and frustration over reorganization

SIU President Randy Dunn listens to committee reports during the SIU Board of Trustees meeting Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, in the conference center at SIUE. (Reagan Gavin | @RGavin_DE)

SIU President Randy Dunn listens to committee reports during the SIU Board of Trustees meeting Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, in the conference center at SIUE. (Reagan Gavin | @RGavin_DE)

Reagan Gavin

SIU President Randy Dunn listens to committee reports during the SIU Board of Trustees meeting Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, in the conference center at SIUE. (Reagan Gavin | @RGavin_DE)

Reagan Gavin

Reagan Gavin

SIU President Randy Dunn listens to committee reports during the SIU Board of Trustees meeting Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, in the conference center at SIUE. (Reagan Gavin | @RGavin_DE)

By Athena Chrysanthou and Reagan Gavin

Following a heated discussion in regards to concerns over the stability and future of SIU and its restructuring, the Board of Trustees approved a two percent tuition raise, Thursday. 


The tuition increase will only affect incoming students, as previous classes are locked in to rates when they first enroll. The proposed increase would have fall 2018 undergraduate students paying $9,637.50 and graduate students paying $11,268 for a year of tuition. 


The board also passed to have one general uncapped on-campus student fee of $117 per credit hour. Student trustee Sam Beard expressed concerns over uncapping student fees and increasing tuition.

“Year after year after year we raise the price of attendance to the university without actually increasing the quality of the education and student life,” Beard said. “By uncapping all of these fees, students who are taking 15 or 18 credit hours will now have to pay even more in fees to the university than if they were capped at 12.”

The Q&A session

Due to a larger amount of attendees who wished to comment after the meetings, their time was limited to two minutes to speak to the board.

Faculty Senate President Kathleen Chwalisz commented on the reorganization process and her belief it will be better for programs.

“We simply have too many departments to support as independent academic units at this time. We don’t have the money, faculty lines and staff positions to support departments in the way they need to be supported to thrive,” Chwalisz said. “Schools save programs, schools have been designed in an elegant manner, right now there are several departments that are not able to cover their own costs in budget.”

Chwalisz said she believes the reorganization provides an unprecedented opportunity for shared governance as faculty have been given a basic framework and are in charge of envisioning what the school will look like, but noted some faculty have chosen not to participate.

Faculty Association President Dave Johnson said the debate of SIU boils down to trust and whether the chancellor can be trusted at this time. 

“Universities however can not be run on trust alone,” Johnson said. “We now know that in the midst of our current crisis Montemagno insisted on SIUC providing jobs for his daughter and son-in-law who lacked any formal qualifications for these jobs.”

Johnson said students, faculty and staff have lost trust in Montemagno and ultimately, only they can rebuild this university.

“We have our work cut out for us, but let us do our work,” Johnson said.

Representative of the Graduate Assistants Union Lauran Schafer spoke of the chancellor creating a “culture of intimidation at SIUC.”

Shafer said she is concerned about the administration’s disregard for shared governance and advised the board to “keep an eye” on the constituency bodies who voted to oppose the universal elimination of departments.

“While I understand, you may all enjoy the cordial, comfortable and respectful demeanor from the chancellor, I think it’s important that you know that it is not the man we all experience when you are not present,” Shafer said.

Graduate and Professional Student Council President Jonathan Flowers spoke to the board in regards to GPSC’s 23-1 vote of no confidence in chancellor Montemagno, which passed Tuesday.

When asked his position on this, Montemagno responded, “I don’t have any real response. I’m disappointed that they would take that position, and I look forward to continuing to work with them.”

Flowers said by passing this vote of no confidence, GPSC is “making clear that it has no confidence in the ability for the chancellor to successfully execute the duties of the office of the chancellor.”

He said GPSC has attempted to make the board and the administration aware of the concerns leading to the vote through a letter of complaint and censure last semester. 

The Daily Egyptian obtained the censure and letter of complaint, and can be found below:

Letter of Complaint

GPSC Censure of Carlo Montemagno

“To be clear, the face of threats to our faculty, our department and our institution, the Graduate and Professional Student Council will not yield, not to this chancellor, not to this board, not now and not ever,” Flowers said.

Associate history professor Natasha Zaretsky spoke to the board and expressed her concerns.

“I am here today to ask for your stewardship,” Zaretsky told the board. “The chancellor’s restructuring plan for our campus is in deep crisis, and the community is looking to you for your leadership.”

Zaretsky told the board the faculty senate, the graduate council and USG passed resolutions by “considerable margins” opposing reorganization.

“These votes don’t lie,” Zaretsky said.“This crisis is happening because in this haste, the chancellor did not take the time to go trust in our campus and learn about our strengths as well as our challenges and now an ethics investigation has eroded trust further.”

Speaking after the meeting, Montemagno said comments made during the Q&A session about a culture of intimidation at SIU were inconsistent.

“I treat our faculty with respect; I treat everybody with respect,” Montemagno said. “I am not rude, I’m not abrasive, and those statements, I think, are not reflective of the actual truth of the matter.”

In regards to the progress of the reorganization, Montemagno said it’s “progressing very well.”

“The number of schools that are proceeding is large, the number of institutions that have voted to extend the consultative period to 30 days is only three out of the 20 schools,” Montemagno said. “People are engaged, people are working hard on it. This has been a very collaborative and deliberative process.”

The next Board of Trustees meeting is set for Thursday, April 12, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.

Editor-in-chief Athena Chrysanthou can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @Chrysant1Athena.

Managing Editor Reagan Gavin can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @RGavin_DE.

To stay up to date with all your Southern Illinois news, follow the Daily Egyptian on Facebook and Twitter.



4 Responses to “Board of Trustees raises tuition two percent, attendees express concern and frustration over reorganization”

  1. Steve Brown on February 8th, 2018 5:40 pm

    Terrific reporting. Is anyone asking if any of this us convincung parents and high school students that that rhe place to be is SIUC?

  2. Don Cornel, Parent of SIU Student on February 9th, 2018 7:12 am

    Totally wrong direction to be going. This short term decision making is killing the university and town.

    Cut the tuition in half, promote it aggressively, and double enrollment.

    The overhead is basically the same whether we keep the same student population or double it. The building maintenance, utilities, etc. are there either way. The number of instructors for classes that are one third full vs two thirds full remains the same. The number of administrative positions remains the same.

    Suck it up for a few years. SOMEHOW cut tuition, double enrollment and get this colossus rumbling in the right direction. the university will thrive again, as will the city.

    This is nearsighted, stop gap, poor decision making.

  3. Clare McCall on February 9th, 2018 11:27 am

    Contrary to his claim otherwise, Chancellor Montemagn has consistently behaved in an intimidating manner toward anyone who has failed to obsequiously go along with his heavy-handed re-organization plan. He promotes this drastic re-organization as being the only option that will ‘save’ SIU. The fact is, a previous institution where he has made these kind of sweeping changes, swiftly changed back to the departmental system which Montemagn had done away with once he departed from the job.It continues to be revealed that Montemagno’s stated aim of “increasing synergy between disciplines” is not his actual agenda. Blatant nepotism has clearly been committed, not only in the obviously inappropriate appointment of his own daughter and son-in-law, but also by Montemagno’s improper insinuation of his former colleagues to SIU departments. At a time when the draconian policy of an indefinite hiring freeze continues to be strictly enforced campus-wide, the propriety of the chancellor “suggesting” that his own personal, hand-picked favorites and friends be appointed to uniquely well-paid campus positions is a slap in the face to every department and surely is a sign that Montemagno’s ‘leadership style’ is corrupt and without regard for the real needs of SIU. He used his power to work around several proper search committee’s efforts to find the best candidates to suit our programs. In these instances he interfered in departmental search committee and plainly insisted on these imposed-from-on-high candidates whom people involved in the searches maintained would fail to pass any open department search process. The fact that the Board of Trustees reaffirmed their faith in chancellor Montemagno’s capability means only that we will need to scrutinize them as closely as the state is now investigating Montemagno, himself. Kudos to all who are investigating this matter and all those who are speaking out boldly under the current oppressive SIU atmosphere under this misguided man.

  4. Jennifer Smith on February 12th, 2018 8:09 am

    This after a Chronicle of Higher Education article cites high tuition as the #1 reason students are leaving Illinois. Upper administration is completely tone deaf.


If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

The student news site of Southern Illinois University