Update: SIU civil service employees outraged over top administrative pay increase
July 22, 2022
Southern Illinois University employees working at the Carbondale campus have expressed anger over pay increases to SIU System President Dan Mahoney and SIU Chancellor Austin Lane. Some plan a walking protest Saturday morning at the Student Services Building.
The increases include an annual salary increase and an annual housing allowance provided by the SIU System along with incentives paid by the SIU Foundation. The compensation was approved unanimously by the SIU System board of trustees.
Since the announcement of the pay raises was made public, faculty and staff at SIU have expressed their discontent with the SIU system prioritizing pay raises for high level administrators while long-term employees see their salary eclipsed by new workers.
Advertisement
Eugene Talley, an associate professor in the automotive school at the Automotive Technology department at SIU, was one of the faculty members who spoke before the board prior to its approval of the financial compensation packages.
“I was hired in 2009… I did take a substantial pay cut to come here,” Talley said. “Since arriving, I have received the raise I earned for tenure promotion, but the university has not had a merit raise the entire time I’ve worked here.”
Talley said he served as the interim director for the Automotive school but declined the offer when he was voted unanimously to take the position permanently.
“The reason I bring this up is because I’m told I can’t receive more than a 10% [raise] and then my salary won’t be looked at until after I serve as director,” Talley said. “So if I were to be the director for 10 years, my salary will not have had a performance adjustment for 23 years.”
Talley said morale at the university among faculty, and in the Automotive and Aviation programs in particular, are at an all time low and a comprehensive review of salaries adjusting for performance is sorely needed.
Diane Lyall, a representative from the Association of Civil Service Employees, also spoke before the board, bringing the concerns of civil servants to the fore.
“We have the most interaction with students; we’re the ones who keep the university running,” Lyall said. “Nevertheless, the lack of pay increases demonstrates that the board does not regard us as important, significant, valuable or essential.”
Lyall said the recent increases to the state minimum wage have created an inequity among new and old employees, with newer hires being paid more than than 10 year veterans of the school.
Advertisement*
“Pay inequity is becoming worse because we’re not rewarding employees who remain at SIU. Full employees are making the same or less than some part time student employees,” Lyall said.
This inequity has led to a cascading effect of experienced civil servants leaving the school while those who remain are told to increase efforts to accommodate the shrinking pool of workers and still maintain the increasing influx of new students, Lyall said.
“Many of us have found ourselves doing the work of more than one person, position or sometimes classification,” Lyall said. “Most employees have been unable to receive a personal position or receive within-classification increases to offset the expanded workload.”
Lyall said the administration is not maintaining an adequate work environment by receiving pay increases while the average employee makes $30,000/year.
Lane said he has been able to implement a two percent increase in salaries each year across the board since starting in his position, but larger increases will require time.
“It’s a marathon more than anything,” Lane said. “Our next phase is with our faculty, so our faculty senate president and faculty committees will look at the salary equity to see how we can actually drive those salaries up as well.”
Lane said continued salary increases are contingent on enrollment increasing or maintaining current levels. He said the current salary issues stem from a longstanding freeze on salaries before his arrival and an incomplete 2015 budget passed by the state senate, which led to a loss of 6000 students.
“I think we’re on the path to really moving the needle and trying to do compensation reviews in a way that’s going to help employees see some differences,” Lane said. “Everytime we see an increase in tuition revenue, and an increase in state appropriations, we’re going to put that money directly on employees so we can deal with that equity gap.”
The pay increases were proposed by Chair of the board of trustees, J. Phil Gilbert. The salary increases and bonuses were contingent on meeting performance metrics including student registration and retention and additional fundraising efforts through the SIU Foundation.
The increases to Mahoney’s salary included an additional $8700 annually along with a housing allowance of $35,000 annually and up to $115,000 in additional performance bonuses paid by the SIU Foundation. Lane’s increases included an additional $6804 annually with a $35,000 annual housing allowance and up to $35,000 in performance bonuses.
“All those who work with the [SIU] Foundation, regardless of position, receive performance bonuses when current goals are achieved,” said Trustee Chair J. Phil Gilbert. “This approach is common for universities across the country.”
Gilbert said Mahoney and Lane will be intimately involved in a $500 million fundraising effort by the SIU Foundation, a non-profit organization of allies to faculty and alumni, and the two will be helping to provide their own incentive from the Foundation.
Lyall said the money spent on administrators would be better spent raising wages at SIU to be more competitive with other similar schools and its sister campus, SIU-Edwardsville (SIUE).
“For the last 19 years I’ve been an office administrator. A new office administrator at Edwardsville makes 74 cents more than I do, and I’ve been a lifelong employee,” Lyall said.
Lyall said many lower-ranked employees feel the administration is receiving special financial treatment at the expense of the rest of the employees who keep the system operating.
“The administration is continuing to be rewarded with raises along with our non-represented employees, no matter what the moment is,” Lyall said. “Try opening your eyes to the hardships that our constituents face everyday. Money is not SIU’s most valuable asset, our most valuable asset is our employees.”
Staff reporter William Box can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter at @William17455137. To stay up to date with all your southern Illinois news, follow the Daily Egyptian on Facebook and Twitter.
Edited for naming attributions.
Advertisement
Tony Williams • Jul 23, 2022 at 10:57 am
With its report on this disgraceful event showing how the BOT regards low-paid employees on this campus, the Southern Illinoisan has an article on a Paul Simon Institute speaker concerning “The Culture of Corruption in Illinois.” This “culture of corruption” has long been a characteristic feature of SIUC. Rewarding two people with huge pay raises who have done NOTHING to help enrollments here, nor raise the poor pay most people exist on, represents the blatant continuing arrogance on the part of those who believe themselves privileged and immune from criticism, directed against staff and students alike.
Many poorly paid, civil service, janitors, physical plant, pol;ice, and other employees are coping with the results of huge inflation, gas prices which make coming to work nearly economically impossible in addition to the problems they already face working here. Several are worming two jobs to make ends meet.Our excellent Morris Library staff face cutbacks and poor pay for the superior work they do. Our SIUC FA, always a staunch supporter of the Administration by deed, if not always word, have agreed to give up the right to strike in exchange for the miserable increases their membership gets and refuses to allow high merit pay to faculty who are productive on this campus. A former President who plagiarized his dissertation whom the BOT allowed to get away with will have a Transportation Center named after him. Mediocrity has its own reward and SIUC-FA proves this. Disenfranchisement is now the only solution to deal with this corrupt body. But other issues remain
The latest situation is appalling. It is a slap in the face to all the dedicated and low-paid workers on this campus.There should be Days of Action planned when students return and calls to set up an outside body to investigate the levels of corruption operating in SIUC. Furthermore, all campus unions should be abolished with rank and file committees, headed by the low paid and less-affluent members of this community, set up to fight a dubious corporation that should no longer bear the name of “university.”
SIUC administrators accept huge raises while the less affluent cope with inflation and students trying to survive economically at great psychological cost. This sort of behaviour should not be allowed to continue.
Margaret • Aug 17, 2022 at 3:03 pm
Maybe we need a new BOT, since they are supposed to be there to keep everything fair across the board, if they can’t be fair then change needs to be even deeper
Tony Williams • Aug 24, 2022 at 10:59 am
M, Like all state Universities, The BOT is appointed by the Governor. U of I once had democratic elections until Blago intervened. Most are political appointments, often prominent GOP business people, which explains why the Covid and imminent Monkey Pox” crisis is not being taken seriously this semester with non-testing of students, lack of social distancing mandates and the compulsory wearing of masks in the classroom now not being enforced especially as Covid is again on this campus.
Pritzker appointed the present BOT and I notice that he has not intervened in this case as he once promptly did in the early months of his rule when he removed one BOT member. However, I doubt whether things will be much better if Darren Bailey gets in as Governor this November. However, the urgent need is to abolish the present structure of the BOT and have democratic elections where people who care deeply for the future of SIUC. This still leaves open the question as to why the President and Chancellor did not refuse these huge raises and work towards making this University a more just and financially equitable place. Those old tunes “We’re in the Money” and Abba’s “It’s a rich man’s world” come to mind.